Choice vs. Chance.
I can’t say “choice or chance” without thinking of that old show, Space: Above and Beyond. I remember when I was a teenager, I thought the graphics were amazing…while now I think the effects are hokey, the script dated, the costuming horrible, and yet I’m still addicted. Maybe it’s my old high school crush on Joel de la Fuente, the actor behind the character Paul Wang - but what I’m remembering right now is the AIs, and their mantra: chance or choice, choice or chance.
That mantra has been stuck in my head since yesterday’s comic regarding research into the existence of a gay gene. The topic really captures me, possibly because of my avid interest in science and science fiction, and possibly because it raises so many questions about who I am - who we all are. It’s at once comforting and disturbing to know that something that can affect you as powerfully as your sexuality can be so wholly beyond your own control.
It’s comforting because it would prove without a doubt that while we may be mutations of the status quo (and mutations aren’t always a bad thing; successful mutations aid evolution, while failed ones die out), we are not abominations; we are not signs of any kind of sin, or of any moral deficit in the eyes of whatever god you choose to follow. We’re a natural result of biology experimenting with variations on the basic template of mankind in an attempt to improve the species. I can’t say if we’re a positive or negative change, but if biology determines sexuality and homosexuality has remained prevalent among both humans and animals, then we must serve some purpose in the natural order of things. I’m fine with that. I don’t mind being part of one big evolved method of population control, really.
But I’m a stubborn creature, and an independent one, and just contrary enough to be bothered by the fact that although I’m quite content being gay, I had no choice in the matter. It would frighten the hell out of me knowing that others had a choice in my sexuality, as could become possible with emerging gene therapy. However, I don’t think I’d mind so much if I had that choice - if I could make it a choice, rather than chance. I think I might even choose to be gay, for personal reasons that I’d rather not share here.
And yet that makes me wonder - out of the gay population of the world, how much of it is chance and how much is choice? It’s hard for me to think that sexuality is wholly biological when one considers aspects of social conditioning; take the classic example of Greek culture, where intimacy among male friends was considered commonplace and was as much of a socialized trait as the modern male’s fear that even a casual touch will cause others to perceive him as gay. I can’t help but think that part of our sexuality is influenced by genetic factors…but part of it may have to do with how we’re socialized, and there may be men and women who identify as gay who don’t share this common “gay gene” that researchers are searching for. At some point they made a choice, whether conscious or not, that affected their entire sexual identity…and wholly as a result of influencing factors in their environment.
Maybe there is no gay gene. Maybe that’s how it works for all of us; something in our developmental years triggers a portion of our brain, and that chance happening causes us to make a subconscious choice - maybe even psychology as a result of biological chemistry. I don’t know. I know that even if science doesn’t ever manage to identify a biological cause for homosexuality, or isolates it to something wholly psychological, I’ll be content either way. Knowing the why won’t do much to change the who. Genetic, psychological, whatever…I’m gay, I’m not ashamed of that fact, and I’m wholly comfortable with who I am…
…whether it was by choice, or by chance.
gay gene, homosexuality in genetics, biological causes for homosexuality, choosing to be gay



August 28th, 2007 at 8:53 am
Adri, you typed, “how much is choice?”
I will raise my hand here. I am a people watcher, and I’ve always found women’s bodies more fascinating than men’s. I just wish I had the courage to ask my favorite employee of the local Office Depot if she has any attachments . . .
That’s just one of my reasons. The others I haven’t quite worked out yet. Just haven’t taken the time to.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:14 pm
The only problem I have with people who think there is a “gay gene” is that they do very little to explain bisexuality. While women rarely turn my head, there are a few times it does happen. Kinsey’s scale has 7 steps, after all (and I’d probably rate a 5).
I only wonder if the researchers are digging in to the person’s preferences deep enough to tell if they are really “gay” or even if they are too embarrased to admit they like both (like so many gay men I know).
August 28th, 2007 at 2:19 pm
Why couldn’t a mutated gene explain bisexuality? To put it very simply: GTAC. If normally there should have been a G at one particular place, but there’s any of the other letters (all producing different results)there… Repeat this a few times and you get homosexuality in any of it’s forms, depending on the ’severity’ of the mutation.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:02 pm
Sexuality is such a complicated subject that I doubt it will reduce to a single flip-flop basic gene. Either there are multiple genes involved, or other environmental factors which contribute to homo/bi/heterosexuality.
August 29th, 2007 at 10:48 am
@Sihaya
I was not saying that the genes do not explain it, but that the “people who think there is a ‘gay gene’” do not include bisexuality in their discussions. I was reading some stuff by the group at Northwestern conducting the study, and I didn’t see much of any mention of it except in the background section on sexuality in the published supporting documents (more of an “it exists” statement than anything).
August 29th, 2007 at 1:26 pm
Sorry for misunderstanding =)
August 29th, 2007 at 2:25 pm
No problem. Even I don’t think the 3 credit hours of organic chemistry I took in college qualifies me as a geneticist xD
December 11th, 2007 at 10:15 am
[...] a matter of hours - in fruit flies, mind you, not in humans. I’ve long been a proponent of some kind of biological explanation for homosexuality, whether it’s genetic or a more complex combination of factors resulting from chemical [...]