As a side dish, revenge actually tastes rather nasty.
It’s been a while since newsmongers have knocked on the Matos-McGreevey doorstep, but it looks like Dinah’s at it again; she’s now demanding that the gay partner of former husband (and former New Jersey governor) disclose his assets as well, as part of their divorce settlement. I suppose now she expects a man who’s wholly unrelated to her to help her “live a lifestyle closer to that of New Jersey’s first lady”. (…I still can’t believe the pretentious snit said that.) Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned, indeed. It seems she’s determined to drag down everyone she can in connection to this, and make sure that both men pay for one man’s mistake.![]()
The last time I caught them in the news, I actually ended up in a rather long phone conversation with my mother about this; I was still outraged that Matos-McGreevey was more interested in attaining revenge through a smear campaign while using the judicial system to take McGreevey for all he was worth than she was in safeguarding the health and well-being of their daughter, Josephine. What McGreevey did was hurtful, yes, and if he knew he was gay he never should have married her. There’s no question that he was in the wrong there, but it was an unfortunate situation for both of them (and I can’t blame McGreevey for the fact that social stigma made him feel as if he couldn’t be openly gay while running for office) and in the end she could have handled the situation with more class, kept their private business private , and done her best to look after their daughter rather than vindicate herself.
My mother surprised me after that spiel by saying that in that situation, she would do the exact same thing.
She then went on a scornful tirade about men in general before starting on gay men in specific; I’m not going to detail it, as my mother is of the erroneous camp who think “feminist” equates with “ball-crusher” and the only thing more offensive to her than a chauvinistic straight man is a gay man who dares not to validate her through attraction to her overwhelming aura of femininity. Suffice to say apparently McGreevey threatened Matos-McGreevey’s womanhood, and that is a crime deserving of any punishment that woman, the state, and the gods may mete out.
Am I just not getting this? I don’t think I’m particularly more civilized than either Matos-McGreevey or my mother; in fact, I’m a rude, caustic, shameless, utterly Bohemian savage, and yet I’m still better-behaved in such situations than they seem to be.
If I had a long-term partner or husband who suddenly announced that he was straight and was leaving me for a woman, I’d be upset, yes. I’d be angry. I’d likely throw things at his head. But I’d do it all in private, and if there was a divorce, I’d just want to make sure that our individual assets were properly separated before letting him go on his merry way while I focused not on destroying his life, but on putting mine back together and making sure it continued smoothly in his absence. No man should ever be so crucial to your life that his departure shatters it to the point where you have to gouge him mercilessly to try to fill in the gaps.
Had we adopted a child (me? As a father? I’d scar the poor thing for life) and the judge granted me custody, you can be damned sure I’d make sure that my former partner had at least partial custody; he signed the adoption papers, too, and would have just as much of a right to see our child. Yes, I would want child support - but only equal to half the amount required to look after the child, and not the amount required to look after me. That would mean half the child’s food, clothing, medical expenses, crucial necessities, college tuition - and only a quarter the monthly rent/mortgage/whatever. Half the living space would be for me, and therefore my responsibility. Half would be for the child, and split between the two parents.
To me that’s just a sensible approach. Relationships combust all the time, whether there’s a wedding ring involved or not. One partner’s confessed sexuality is just another of a long list of reasons that cause explosive separations: infidelity, drug abuse, spousal abuse, alcoholism, the list goes on. Whatever damage was done in that time, whether emotional or physical…money won’t heal it; revenge will only leave the wounds to fester without closing. All of the ugliness that goes into that does more harm to the bitter party than to their target, and when it’s over, will leave them distinctly unsatisfied.
I’ve said it before, but it bears repeating: have a little class, Dinah. Choose to be the better person and behave that way, rather than loudly proclaiming why your ex-husband is worse.
governor james mcgreevey, james mcgreevey, dinah matos, dinah matos mcgreevey, mcgreevey, matos, gay nj governor, gay new jersey governor, jacqueline mcgreevey, coming out, silent partner, cipel, golan cipel, omfg!copypastaTAG!
Listen to DR Streaming Radio



February 7th, 2008 at 9:45 am
I’ve shaken my head many times at this whole story. I don’t understand her vile towards the man. He found him a man, why doesn’t she concentrate on finding her one if she needs a man to validate her femininity. McGreevy’s partner is wholly unrelated to this mess and should be left out of it. She has no claim to his assets, just as if she’d have no claim to another woman’s assets had McGreevy left her for another woman.
It’s a very shameful episode. Yes, he was wrong for marrying her if he knew he was gay, but she needs to pick up the pieces of her life and move forward, not try to reclaim the past. I really feel sorry for their daughter, who’s caught in the middle of all of this, and in ten years or so probably isn’t going to embarassed about having a gay father, but that her parents sloshed each other through the mud. I certainly would be.
I don’t get the whole being offended because gay men don’t validate you through attraction thing. But then, I’m a lesbian, maybe that’s why.
February 7th, 2008 at 2:40 pm
I don’t understand how she doesn’t care about how this is affecting her daughter. Apart from being rather vengeful and unpleasant, she appears to be utterly selfish. Will she not think of the children?
February 7th, 2008 at 4:51 pm
Hardly anyone ever thinks of the children.
February 7th, 2008 at 4:55 pm
I have to agree that I feel sorriest for her daughter in this whole mess. Kids with divorced parents have it bad enough without being used as pawns or leverage in this kind of mess. And a seven- or eight-year-old is just old enough to be in hell without being quite old enough to understand why.
As for why Dinah is so upset, I think it’s largely because she feels she’s been both betrayed and socially embarrassed. She’s probably trying to make him into the sole villain in this whole mess… and failing miserably, but that’s another matter entirely.
February 8th, 2008 at 12:20 am
I don’t understand this, either. What does the guy’s boyfriend have to do with anything? If he’d married a woman, would the wife have to disclose her financial assets?
And I hate what divorce does to kids. Personally, I think when the parents start using the kids as weapons against each other, some kind, loving grandparent or aunt or family friend or something should take the kids until the case is closed. I’ve seen too many of my friends be emotionally manipulated by their parents during divorce, to the point where they hate both parents.
February 8th, 2008 at 1:01 am
I just…why…how…huh? And people wonder why I identify gay when I’m actually bi…
This woman needs to be institutionalized, or something. She’s a total loon…and that child needs to be taken from her before she’s raised to be just as bad as mommy dearest. Granted, my own mother did a little bit of that in retaliation against my father…but she grew up and realized she’s not defined by my father, but by herself.
Jesus, woman, grow up!